ElectionNovember 3, 2026 · statewide ballot
2026 Proposed Constitutional Amendments
The ten amendments to the Louisiana Constitution on the November 3, 2026 ballot, in the Secretary of State's words: the number, the ballot question and the act, exactly as published. Under each one, the Informer's plain reading of what the act would change and what a yes or no vote means. Every voter in the state votes on all ten; each passes with a majority of the votes cast statewide.
- 1Do you support an amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran with a service-connected disability, who receives the additional property tax exemption, to make a one-time transfer of the additional property tax exemption to a subsequent qualifying property?
- 2Do you support an amendment to allow a local taxing authority to continue to levy a lower millage rate without losing its ability to adjust to the maximum authorized millage rate from a prior year's reassessment?
- 3Do you support an amendment to prohibit a defendant from being released on any post-conviction bail if the defendant is convicted of an aggravated offense against a minor child?
- 4Do you support an amendment to prohibit a person who has served more than one and one-half terms as governor from being elected as governor for any future term?
- 5Do you support an amendment to authorize a state retirement system to apply any nonrecurring state monies it receives to any of its unfunded accrued liability rather than requiring application to its oldest unfunded accrued liability?
- 6Do you support an amendment to authorize parishes and municipalities to extend an additional property tax exemption for property subject to the homestead exemption that is owned and occupied by a person who is at least sixty-five years of age and who qualifies for the special assessment level?
- 7Do you support an amendment to allow for the use of public funds by a political subdivision for the purpose of identifying, inventorying, removing or replacing drinking water utility service lines made of or affected by materials as specified or prescribed by the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, promulgated October 30, 2024, or subsequent promulgation, on property owned by utility customers?
- 8Do you support an amendment to prohibit expropriation of property by a foreign adversary or an agent of a foreign adversary?
- 9Do you support an amendment to increase the maximum amount of income a person may receive and still qualify for the special assessment level for residential property receiving the homestead exemption?
- 10Do you support an amendment to allow property tax exemptions for blighted or derelict properties that have been rehabilitated, and to require the legislature to enact laws providing for administration of these exemptions?
Proposed Amendment No. 1Act 39 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran with a service-connected disability, who receives the additional property tax exemption, to make a one-time transfer of the additional property tax exemption to a subsequent qualifying property?
The act Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 21(K)(1) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem tax exemptions; to provide relative to the ad valorem tax exemption for certain disabled veterans and their surviving spouses; to allow for the transfer of certain exemptions by a surviving spouse; to provide for limitations; to provide for effectiveness; and to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors and provide a ballot proposition.
Ballot note Amends Article VII, Section 21(K)(1). Effective January 1, 2027.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. A veteran with a service-connected disability gets a property tax exemption on the home beyond the regular homestead exemption: the next $2,500 of assessed value at a disability rating of 50 to 69 percent, the next $4,500 at 70 to 99 percent, and the whole assessed value at 100 percent or unemployability. When the veteran dies, the surviving spouse keeps the exemption as long as the spouse owns and lives in that same home.
What would change. A surviving spouse who has taken the exemption and then buys a different home could move the exemption to the new home, once. The amount moved is capped at what was claimed on the old home in its last year. The assessor may ask for records of the old exemption to set the amount.
A yes vote: A surviving spouse could carry the exemption to one new home.
A no vote: The exemption stays with the home the veteran lived in.
Senate Bill 180 by Sen. Franklin Foil. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 2Act 273 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to allow a local taxing authority to continue to levy a lower millage rate without losing its ability to adjust to the maximum authorized millage rate from a prior year's reassessment?
The act Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 23(C) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem property tax millage rate adjustments; to provide for maximum authorized millage rates; to provide for applicability; to provide for an effective date; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Amends Article VII, Section 23(C). Effective January 1, 2027.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. Voters approve a maximum property tax rate, in mills, for each local taxing body: the parish council, a school board, a drainage or fire district and the rest. After a parishwide reassessment the rates are adjusted so the body collects about the same dollars as before. A body may then raise its rate back toward the maximum by a two-thirds vote after a public hearing, without a new election.
What would change. A body that levies less than its maximum would keep the ability to return to the maximum authorized rate from a prior year’s reassessment, for as long as that authorized rate has not expired. Going back up would still take a two-thirds vote of the body after a public hearing with published notice, not a new election.
A yes vote: A local body that lowers its rate keeps the ability to raise it later, up to the old maximum, by a two-thirds vote after a public hearing.
A no vote: The current rules on adjusting rates after a reassessment stay as they are.
House Bill 521 by Rep. Roger Wilder III. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 3Act 271 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to prohibit a defendant from being released on any post-conviction bail if the defendant is convicted of an aggravated offense against a minor child?
The act Proposing to add Article I, Section 18(C) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to the right to bail; to prohibit bail for offenders who have been convicted of certain offenses; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Adds Article I, Section 18(C).
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. After a conviction, while the case is appealed, bail is a right when the sentence is five years or less and is up to the judge when it is longer.
What would change. After a conviction, a court could not release the defendant on bail if the crime is an aggravated offense under the state’s sex offender registration law (R.S. 15:541) and the victim was a minor. That law’s list includes first, second and third degree rape, sexual battery and second degree sexual battery, aggravated, second degree and simple kidnapping of a child, molestation of a juvenile, aggravated crime against nature, human trafficking involving a minor and trafficking of children for sexual purposes.
A yes vote: No bail after conviction for those crimes when the victim was a minor.
A no vote: Courts keep the discretion they have now on bail after a conviction.
House Bill 51 by Rep. Debbie Villio. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 4Act 414 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to prohibit a person who has served more than one and one-half terms as governor from being elected as governor for any future term?
The act Proposing to amend Article IV, Section 3(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, to provide for the term limit for the office of the governor; to provide for a lifetime term limit; to provide that the limit is not limited to service in successive terms; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Amends Article IV, Section 3(B).
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. A person who has served more than one and one-half terms as governor in two consecutive terms cannot be elected to the next term. After sitting out a term, that person can run again.
What would change. A person who has served more than one and one-half terms as governor could never be elected governor again. The words "in two consecutive terms" and "for the succeeding term" come out; the limit would count all service, past and future, and apply to every future election.
A yes vote: A lifetime limit: no one who has served more than a term and a half can be elected governor again.
A no vote: The limit stays on consecutive terms only.
House Bill 225 by Rep. Mike Bayham. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 5Act 606 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to authorize a state retirement system to apply any nonrecurring state monies it receives to any of its unfunded accrued liability rather than requiring application to its oldest unfunded accrued liability?
The act Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 10(D)(2)(b)(iii) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to application of certain state monies to state retirement system unfunded accrued liability; to remove requirement that such monies be applied to the oldest system liabilities first; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Amends Article VII, Section 10(D)(2)(b)(iii).
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. At least 25 percent of any money the state’s official forecast labels nonrecurring (one-time money) must go to the state retirement systems to pay down their unfunded accrued liability, the pension debt. Each system must apply that money to its debts in the order they were created, oldest first. None of it may fund cost-of-living increases.
What would change. A system could apply the money to any part of its unfunded liability, not only the oldest. The 25 percent requirement and the ban on using it for cost-of-living increases stay.
A yes vote: Retirement systems choose which pension debts the one-time money pays down.
A no vote: The money keeps going to the oldest debts first.
House Bill 27 by Rep. Dixon McMakin. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 6Act 274 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to authorize parishes and municipalities to extend an additional property tax exemption for property subject to the homestead exemption that is owned and occupied by a person who is at least sixty-five years of age and who qualifies for the special assessment level?
The act Proposing to add Article VII, Section 21(P) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem taxation; to extend an ad valorem tax exemption for property owners who are sixty-five years of age or older; to provide for the amount of the exemption; to provide for requirements and limitations; to provide for implementation of the exemption by parishes and municipalities; to prohibit the reappraisal and valuation of property for purposes of millage adjustments under certain circumstances; to provide for applicability; to provide for an effective date; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Adds Article VII, Section 21(P). Effective January 1, 2028.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. The homestead exemption covers the first $7,500 of a home’s assessed value, which is $75,000 of market value, since homes are assessed at 10 percent. Homeowners 65 and older whose income is under the limit can freeze their assessment at its current level (the special assessment level).
What would change. A parish or municipality could add an exemption for owners 65 and older who qualify for the freeze, but only after its own voters approve it at a local election. The amount rises with age, in five steps listed below. A surviving spouse not more than five years younger keeps it. The taxing body absorbs the lost revenue; it cannot be shifted to other taxpayers. In St. Charles Parish this would apply only if the parish or a municipality put it on a ballot and voters approved it.
| Age | Exempt from property tax |
|---|
| 65 through 68 | the next $6,000 of assessed value |
| 69 through 72 | the next $12,000 |
| 73 through 76 | the next $18,000 |
| 77 through 80 | the next $24,000 |
| 81 and older | the next $30,000 |
A yes vote: Local governments may offer the exemption if their voters approve it.
A no vote: No new local exemption for homeowners 65 and older.
House Bill 514 by Rep. Les Farnum. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 7Act 607 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to allow for the use of public funds by a political subdivision for the purpose of identifying, inventorying, removing or replacing drinking water utility service lines made of or affected by materials as specified or prescribed by the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, promulgated October 30, 2024, or subsequent promulgation, on property owned by utility customers?
The act Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 14(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to water utility service lines; to provide for the use of public funds to remove or replace drinking water utility service lines located on property owned by utility customers; to provide relative to identifying, inventorying water utility service lines made of or affected by certain hazardous materials; to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors and provide a ballot proposition.
Ballot note Amends Article VII, Section 14.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. The constitution bars the state and local governments from giving public money or property to private persons, with a list of exceptions. A water service line runs from the main in the street to the house; the part on the customer’s property belongs to the customer, so a public water system cannot spend public money on it.
What would change. A new exception would let a parish, city or water district spend public money to find, list, remove or replace drinking water service lines on customers’ property that are made of, or affected by, the materials named in the federal Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (the Environmental Protection Agency rule of October 30, 2024, and later versions).
A yes vote: Local governments may use public money to replace lead and similar service lines on private property.
A no vote: The customer keeps paying for the line on the customer’s side of the property line.
Senate Bill 228 by Sen. Royce Duplessis. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 8Act 277 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to prohibit expropriation of property by a foreign adversary or an agent of a foreign adversary?
The act Proposing to amend Article I, Section 4(B)(4) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to the right to property; to prohibit expropriation by foreign adversaries; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Amends Article I, Section 4(B)(4).
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. A private company that the law allows to expropriate, such as a pipeline or utility company, may take property only for a public and necessary purpose, with just compensation, and a court decides whether the purpose is public and necessary.
What would change. A private entity that is a foreign adversary, or an agent of one, as defined by state law, could not take or damage property at all. State law (R.S. 9:2717.1) defines a foreign adversary by the United States Commerce Department’s list, which now names China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and the Maduro regime in Venezuela.
A yes vote: Foreign adversaries and their agents are barred from expropriating property in Louisiana.
A no vote: The current rules on expropriation by private entities stay as they are.
House Bill 192 by Rep. Charles Owen. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 9Act 220 (2025 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to increase the maximum amount of income a person may receive and still qualify for the special assessment level for residential property receiving the homestead exemption?
The act Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 18(G)(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem taxation; to provide for assessment of property for ad valorem tax purposes; to provide with respect to the special assessment level; to provide with respect to the income limit associated with qualifying for the special assessment level; to provide for an effective date; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Amends Article VII, Section 18(G)(1)(a)(ii). Effective January 1, 2027.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. Homeowners 65 and older, and certain disabled people and veterans, can freeze the assessed value of their home so their property tax does not rise with home values. The freeze is not available to anyone whose adjusted gross income is over $100,000, a limit that was set to start rising with inflation in the 2026 tax year.
What would change. The limit would rise to $150,000 in adjusted gross income, and starting with the 2028 tax year it would be adjusted for inflation each year. For married people filing separately, both returns count. Assessors could check income on the Louisiana return. The rule that other taxpayers cannot be charged more to make up for the freeze stays.
A yes vote: More homeowners qualify for the freeze: the income limit becomes $150,000.
A no vote: The limit stays at $100,000.
House Bill 300 by Rep. Shane Mack. Read the act at the Legislature →
Proposed Amendment No. 10Act 272 (2026 Regular Session)
Do you support an amendment to allow property tax exemptions for blighted or derelict properties that have been rehabilitated, and to require the legislature to enact laws providing for administration of these exemptions?
The act Proposing to add Article VII, Section 21(P) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem taxes; to authorize the exemption of certain property from ad valorem taxes subject to conditions provided in law; to require the legislature to enact laws relative to implementation of the exemption; to provide for applicability; to provide for an effective date; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Ballot note Adds Article VII, Section 21(P). Effective January 1, 2027.
The Informer's plain reading of the act. These are the paper's words, not the state's.
The law now. The constitution lists exactly which property may be exempt from property tax and says no other property may be.
What would change. An optional exemption would be added for blighted or derelict property that has been rehabilitated. The Legislature would have to pass laws defining blighted and derelict property, setting how long the exemption lasts, and setting the rules a parish or city follows to grant it. Nothing takes effect until those laws exist.
A yes vote: The Legislature may create a local exemption for rebuilt blighted property.
A no vote: No such exemption is possible.
House Bill 214 by Rep. Chance Henry. Read the act at the Legislature →
Sources
The numbers, ballot questions and act titles are the Secretary of State's list for the November 3, 2026 election, unchanged. The plain readings were written from each act on the Legislature's website, linked under each amendment. The Informer takes no position on any of them.